Sunday, June 10, 2012

More Evidence Dark Chocolate Is Cardioprotective


June 4, 2012 — The blood pressure–lowering and lipid effects of dark chocolate could be an effective — and money-saving — strategy for preventing cardiovascular events in high-risk patients, a new study suggests.
"The findings of this study suggest that the blood pressure lowering and lipid effects of plain dark chocolate could represent an effective and cost effective strategy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in people with metabolic syndrome (and no diabetes)," the researchers, with senior author Christopher M. Reid, PhD, CCRE Therapeutics, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, conclude.
"Chocolate benefits from being by and large a pleasant and, hence sustainable, treatment option," they write. "Evidence to date suggests that the chocolate would need to be dark and of at least 60-70% cocoa, or formulated to be enriched with polyphenols."
Dark chocolate, derived from coca beans, is rich in polyphenols, specifically flavonoids that exhibit antihypertensive, anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, and metabolic effects, all of which may contribute to cardio-protection.
The study was published online May 31 in the BMJ.
Long-Term Effects
Previous studies have shown that dark chocolate consumption may lower blood pressure, but they have been relatively short, only up to a maximum of 18 weeks. Studies have also shown that dark chocolate may decrease total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, but again, these changes have been explored only in short-term trials.
To determine potential long-term effects of consuming dark chocolate every day, as well as the cost-effectiveness of this strategy, Australian researchers used statistical modeling techniques, particularly a Markov model to which health states ("alive without cardiovascular disease," "alive with cardiovascular disease," "dead from cardiovascular disease," "dead from other causes") and decision analysis (no dark chocolate [control], or with dark chocolate [treatment]) were added.
With each annual cycle, the researchers used risk prediction algorithms and population life tables to estimate how eating dark chocolate every day for 10 years would affect patients with metabolic syndrome.
The study used data on 2013 participants from the Australian Diabetes Obesity and Lifestyles study who had metabolic syndrome, did not have a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease or frank diabetes, and who were not receiving antihypertensive medications.
The patients were relatively young (mean age, 53.6 years) and considered at high risk: They had a mean systolic blood pressure of 141.1 mmHg, mean total cholesterol level of 6.1 mmol/L, mean hemoglobin A1c of 34.4 mmol/mol, and mean waist circumference of 100.4 cm.
The researchers concluded that under the best-case scenario, in which all these patients ate dark chocolate daily for a decade, 70 nonfatal cardiovascular events, including nonfatal stroke and nonfatal myocardial infarction per 10,000 population, as well as 15 cardiovascular related deaths per 10,000 population, could be prevented.
The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $52,500 per years of life saved when $42 per person per year was assumed to have been spent on a prevention strategy using dark chocolate.
Even if only 80% of individuals with metabolic syndrome adhered to daily consumption of dark chocolate over 10 years, preventing only 55 nonfatal and 10 fatal events per 10,000, it would still be considered an effective and cost-effective intervention strategy, the authors write.
Prevention Strategy
A dark chocolate prevention strategy of $42 per person per year in a high-risk population would be cost-effective "based on the commonly accepted, albeit arbitrary, threshold of $50,000 per years of life saved," said the authors.
The $42 per person per year could be devoted to advertising, education campaigns, or, potentially, subsidization of dark chocolate in this high-risk population, they said.
The authors point out that they did not assess the potential effectiveness of dark chocolate consumption on cardiovascular events other than nonfatal stroke and nonfatal myocardial infarction, such as heart failure.
They also stressed that the effects of dark chocolate consumption on blood pressure and total cholesterol, although beneficial, are not as profound as those of drug interventions.
The authors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
BMJ. Published online May 31, 2012. Abstract

Saturday, February 25, 2012

TAUFIK RECOMENDATIONS 4


OVULATION INDUCTION IN POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME
 JOGC, No. 242, May 2010; 32(5):495–502

 
Recommendations
1. Weight loss, exercise, and lifestyle modifications have been proven effective in restoring ovulatory cycles and achieving pregnancy in overweight women with PCOS and should be the first-line option for these women. (II-3A) Morbidly obese women should seek expert advice about pregnancy risk. (III-A)
2. Clomiphene citrate has been proven effective in ovulation induction for women with PCOS and should be considered the first-line therapy. Patients should be informed that there is an increased risk of multiple pregnancy with ovulation induction using clomiphene citrate. (I-A)
3. Metformin combined with clomiphene citrate may increase ovulation rates and pregnancy rates but does not significantly improve the live birth rate over that of clomiphene citrate alone.(I-A) Metformin may be added to clomiphene citrate in women with clomiphene resistance who are older and who have
visceral obesity. (I-A)
4. Gonadotropin should be considered second-line therapy for fertility in anovulatory women with PCOS. The treatment requires ultrasound and laboratory monitoring. High costs and the risk of multiple pregnancy and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome are drawbacks of the treatment. (II-2A)
5. Laparoscopic ovarian drilling may be considered in women with clomiphene-resistant PCOS, particularly when there are other indications for laparoscopy. (I-A) Surgical risks need to be considered in these patients. (III-A)
6. In vitro fertilization should be reserved for women with PCOS who fail gonadotropin therapy or who have other indications for IVF treatment. (II-2A)

TAUFIK RECOMENDATIONS 3


 ENDOMETRIOSIS: DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT
JOGC, Volume 32, Number 7, July  2010. Supplement 2

Chapter 1: Introduction
Summary Statements
1. Endometriosis is common, affecting 5% to 10% of the female population, and the significance of the disease depends on the clinical presentation. (II-3)
2. The cellular and molecular etiologic theories of endometriosis as an inflammatory and estrogen-dependent disorder have improved our understanding. (III)
Chapter 2: Pain Management
Summary Statements
1. Symptoms may vary; however, certain hallmark symptoms may be more likely to sug gest endometriosis. The clinician should be aware of atypical presentations.(I)
2. Endometriosis can be a chronic, relapsing disorder, which may necessitate a long-term follow-up.(I)
3. When deeply infiltrating endometriosis is suspected, a pelvic examination, including rectovaginal examination, is essential.(III)
Recommendations
1. Investigation of suspected endometriosis should include history, physical, and imaging assessments.(III-A)
2. Routine CA-125 testing as part of the diagnostic investigation of endometriosis should not be performed (II-2D)
Chapter 3: Medical Management of Pain Associated With Endometriosis
Recommendations
1. Combined hormonal contraceptives, ideally administered continuously, should be considered as first-line agents. (I-A)
2. Administration of progestin alone orally, intramuscularly, or subcutaneously—may also be considered as first-line therapy. (I-A)
3. A GnRH agonist with HT addback, or the LNG-IUS, should be considered a second-line therapeutic option. (I-A)
4. A GnRH agonist should be combined with HT addback therapy from commencement of therapy and may be considered for longer-term use (> 6 months). (I-A)
5. While awaiting resolution of symptoms from the directed medical or surgical treatments for endometriosis, practitioners should use clinical judgement in prescribing analgesics ranging from NSAIDs to opioids. (III-A)
Chapter 4: Surgical Management of Endometriosis
Summary Statements
1. Treatment of endometriosis by excision or ablation reduces pain. (I)
2. For women with endometriomas, excision rather than drainage or fulguration provides better pain relief, a reduced recurrence rate, and a histopathological diagnosis. (I)
3. Laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation alone does not offer significant relief of endometriosis-related pain(I)
Recommendations
1. An asymptomatic patient with an incidental finding of endometriosis at the time of surgery does not require any medical or surgical intervention. (III-A)
2. Surgical management in women with endometriosis-related pain should be reserved for those in whom medical treatment has failed. (III A)
3.Surgical treatment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis may require particular experience with a multidisciplinary approach. (III-A)
4. Ovarian endometriomas greater than 3 cm in diameter in women with pelvic pain should be excised if possible. (I-A)
5. In patients not seeking pregnancy, therapy with CHCs (cyclic or continuous) should be considered after surgical management of ovarian endometriomas. (I-A)
6. Presacral neurectomy may be considered as an adjunct to the surgical treatment of endometriosis-related pelvic pain.(I-A)
Chapter 5. Surgical Management of Infertility Associated With Endometriosis
Summary Statements
1. Laparoscopic treatment of minimal or mild endometriosis improves pregnancy rates regard less of the treatment modality. (I)
2. The effect on fertility of surgical treatment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis is controversial. (II)
3. Laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometriomas more than 3 cm in diameter may improve fertility. (II)
Chapter 6: Medical Treatment of Infertility Related to  Endometriosis
Summary Statement
1. If a patient with known endometriosis is to undergo IVF, GnRH agonist suppression with HT addback for 3 to 6 months before IVF is associated with an improved pregnancy rate. (I)
Recommendation
1. Medical management of infertility related to endometriosis in the form of hormonal suppression is ineffective and should not be offered. (I-E)
Chapter 7: Endometriosis in Adolescents
Summary Statements
1. Endometriosis is the most common cause of secondary dysmenorrhea in adolescents. (II-2)
2. Adolescents with endometriosis are more likely than adult women to present with acyclic pain. (III)
3. The physical examination of adolescents with endometriosis will rarely reveal abnormalities, as most will have early-stage disease. (II-2)
Recommendations
1. Endometriosis in adolescents is often early stage and atypical. Laparoscopists should look intra abdominally for clear vesicles and red lesions in adolescents. (II-2B)
2. All available therapies for endometriosis may be used in adolescents, but the age of the patient and the side-effect profiles of the medications should be considered. (III-A)
Chapter 8: Endometriosis and Cancer
Summary Statements
1. The prevalence of ovarian cancer in patients with endometriosis is under 1%. (II-2)
2. Excision or sampling of suspected endometriosis lesions and endometriomas helps con firm the diagnosis and exclude underlying malignancy. (II-2)
Recommendations
1. Biopsy of endometriosis lesions should be considered to confirm the diagnosis and to rule out underlying malignancy. (II-2A)
2. Suspected ovarian endometriomas should be treated according to the SOGC guide line “Initial Evaluation and Referral Guidelines for Management of Pelvic/Ovarian Masses.” (III-A).

TAUFIK RECOMENDATIONS 2


ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN OBSTETRIC PROCEDURES
(SOGC No. 247, September 2010)

Summary Statement
1. Available evidence does not support the use of prophylactic antibiotics to reduce infectious morbidity following operative vaginal delivery. (II-1)
2. There is insufficient evidence to argue for or against the use of prophylactic antibiotics to reduce infectious morbidity for manual removal of the placenta. (III)
3. There is insufficient evidence to argue for or against the use of prophylactic antibiotics at the time of postpartum dilatation and curettage for retained products of conception. (III)
4. Available evidence does not support the use of prophylactic antibiotics to reduce infectious morbidity following elective or emergency cerclage. (II-3)
Recommendations
1. All women undergoing elective/ emergency Caesarean section should receive antibiotic prophylaxis. (I-A)
2. The choice of antibiotic for Caesarean section should be a single dose of a first-generation cephalosporin. If the patient has a penicillin allergy, clindamycin or erythromycin can be used. (I-A)
3. The timing of prophylactic antibiotics for Caesarean section should be 15 to 60 minutes prior to skin incision. No additional doses are recommended. (I-A)
4. If an open abdominal procedure is lengthy (> 3 hours) or estimated blood loss is greater than 1500 mL, an additional dose of the prophylactic antibiotic may be given 3 to 4 hours after the
initial dose. (III-L)
5. Prophylactic antibiotics may be considered for the reduction of infectious morbidity associated with repair of third and fourth degree perineal injury. (I-B)

TAUFIK’S RECOMENDATIONS 1


DIAGNOSIS, EVALUATION, AND MANAGEMENT OF THE HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS OF PREGNANCY
JOGC Volume 30, Number 3, March, 2008 (No. 206 March 2008)

CHAPTER 1: DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION
Recommendations: Measurement of BP
1. BP should be measured with the woman in the sitting position with the arm at the level of the heart. (II-2A)
2. An appropriately sized cuff (i.e., length of 1.5 times the circumference of the arm) should be used. (II-2A)
3. Korotkoff phase V should be used to designate diastolic BP. (I-A)
4. If BP is consistently higher in one arm, the arm with the higher values should be used for all BP measurements. (III–B)
5. BP can be measured using a mercury sphygmomanometer, calibrated aneroid device, or an automated BP device that has been validated for use in preeclampsia. (II-2A)
6. Automated BP machines may underestimate BP in women with preeclampsia, and comparison of readings using mercury sphygmomanometry or an aneroid device is recommended. (II-2A)
7. Ambulatory BP monitoring (by 24-hour or home measurement) may be useful to detect isolated office (white coat) hypertension. (II-2B)
8. Patients should be instructed in proper BP measurement technique if they are to perform home BP monitoring. (III-B)
Recommendations: Diagnosis of Hypertension
1. The diagnosis of hypertension should be based on office or in-hospital BP measurements. (II-2B)
2. Hypertension in pregnancy should be defined as a diastolic BP of ≥ 90 mmHg, based on the average of at least two measurements,taken using the same arm. (II-2B)
3. Women with a systolic BP of ≥ 140 mmHg should be followed closely for development of diastolic hypertension. (II-2B)
4. Severe hypertension should be defined as a systolic BP of ≥ 160 mmHg or a diastolic BP of ≥ 110 mmHg. (II-2B)
5. For non-severe hypertension, serial BP measurements should be recorded before a diagnosis of hypertension is made. (II-2B)
6. For severe hypertension, a repeat measurement should be taken for confirmation in 15 minutes. (III-B)
7. Isolated office (white coat) hypertension should be defined as office diastolic BP of ≥ 90 mmHg, but home BP of < 135/85 mmHg. (III-B)
Recommendations: Measurement o Proteinuria
1. All pregnant women should be assessed for proteinuria. (II-2B)
2. Urinary dipstick testing may be used for screening for proteinuria when the suspicion of preeclampsia is low. (II-2B)
3. More definitive testing for proteinuria (by urinary protein: creatinine ratio or 24-hour urine collection) is encouraged when there is a suspicion of preeclampsia, including in hypertensive pregnant women with rising BP or in normotensive pregnant women with symptoms or signs suggestive of preeclampsia. (II-2A)
Recommendations: Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Proteinuria
1. Proteinuria should be strongly suspected when urinary dipstick proteinuria is ≥ 2+. (II-2A)
2. Proteinuria should be defined as ≥ 0.3g/d in a 24-hour urine collection or ≥ 30 mg/mmol urinary creatinine in a spot (random) urine sample. (II-2B)
3. There is insufficient information to make a recommendation about the accuracy of the urinary albumin: creatinine ratio. (II-2 I)
Recommendations: Classification of HDP
1. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy should be classified as pre-existing or gestational hypertension on the basis of different diagnostic and therapeutic factors. (II-2B)
2. The presence or absence of preeclampsia must be ascertained, given its clear association with more adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. (II-2B)
3. In women with pre-existing hypertension, preeclampsia should be defined as resistant hypertension, new or worsening proteinuria, or one or more of the other adverse conditions. (II-2B)
4. In women with gestational hypertension, preeclampsia should be defined as new-onset proteinuria or one or more of the other adverse conditions. (II-2B)
5. Severe preeclampsia should be defined as preeclampsia with onset before 34 weeks’ gestation, with heavy proteinuria or with one or more adverse conditions. (II-2B)
6. The term PIH (pregnancy-induced hypertension) should be abandoned, as its meaning in clinical practice is unclear. (III-D)
Recommendations: Investigations to Classify HDP
1. For women with pre-existing hypertension, serum creatinine, serum potassium, and urinalysis should be performed in early pregnancy if not previously documented. (II 2B)
2. Among women with pre-existing hypertension, additional baseline laboratory testing may be based on other considerations deemed important by health care providers. (III-C)
3. Women with suspected preeclampsia should undergo the maternal laboratory (II-2B) and fetal (II 1B) testing described in Table 3.
4. If initial testing is reassuring, maternal and fetal testing should be repeated if there is ongoing concern about preeclampsia (e.g., change in maternal and/or fetal condition). (III-C)
5. Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry may be useful among hypertensive pregnant women to support a placental origin for hypertension, proteinuria, and/or adverse conditions. (II-2B)
6. Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry may be useful to support a placental origin for intrauterine fetal growth restriction. (II-2B)
CHAPTER 2: PREDICTION, PREVENTION, AND PROGNOSIS OF PREECLAMPSIA
Recommendations: Predicting Preeclampsia
1. At booking for antenatal care, women with markers of increased risk for preeclampsia should be offered obstetric consultation. (II-2B)
2. Women at increased risk of preeclampsia should be considered for risk stratification involving a multivariable clinical and laboratory approach. (II-2B)
Recommendations: Preventing Preeclampsia and its Complications in Women at Low Risk
1. Calcium supplementation (of at least 1g/d, orally) is recommended for women with low dietary intake of calcium (< 600 mg/d). (I-A)
2. The following are recommended for other established beneficial effects in pregnancy: abstention from alcohol for prevention of fetal alcohol effects, (II-2E) exercise for maintenance of fitness, (I-A) periconceptual use of a folate-containing multivitamin for prevention of neural tube defects, (I-A) and smoking cessation for prevention of low birthweight and preterm birth. (I-E)
3. The following may be useful: periconceptual use of a folate-containing multivitamin, (I-B) or exercise. (II-2B)
4. The following are not recommended for preeclampsia prevention, but may be useful for prevention of other pregnancy complications: prostaglandin precursors, (I-C) or supplementation with magnesium, (I-C) or zinc. (I-C)
5. The following are not recommended: dietary salt restriction during pregnancy, (I-D) calorie restriction during pregnancy for overweight women, (I-D) low-dose aspirin, (I E) vitamins C and E (based on current evidence), (I-E) or thiazide diuretics. (I-E)
6. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation about the following: a heart-healthy diet, (II-2I) workload or stress reduction, (II-2I) supplementation with iron with/without folate, (I-I) or pyridoxine. (I-I).
Recommendations: Preventing Preeclampsia and its Complications in Women at Increased Risk
1. Low-dose aspirin (I-A) and calcium supplementation (of at least 1 g/d) are recommended for women with low calcium intake, (I-A) and the following are recommended for other established beneficial effects in pregnancy (as discussed for women at low risk of preeclampsia): abstention from alcohol, (II-2 E) periconceptual use of a folate containing multivitamin, (I-A) and smoking cessation. (I-E)
2. Low-dose aspirin (75–100 mg/d )(III-B) should be administered at bedtime, (I-B) starting pre-pregnancy or from diagnosis of pregnancy but before 16 weeks’ gestation, (III B) and continuing until delivery. (I-A)
3. The following may be useful: avoidance of inter-pregnancy weight gain, (II-2E) increased rest at home in the third trimester, (I-C) and reduction of workload or stress. (III-C)
4. The following are not recommended for preeclampsia prevention but may be useful for prevention of other pregnancy complications: prostaglandin precursors (I-C) and magnesium supplementation. (I-C)
5. The following are not recommended: calorie restriction in overweight women during pregnancy, (I-D) weight maintenance in obese women during pregnancy, (III-D) antihypertensive therapy specifically to prevent preeclampsia, (I-D) vitamins C and E. (I-E)
6. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation about the usefulness of the following: dietary salt restriction during pregnancy, (III-I) the heart-healthy diet (III-I); exercise (I-I); heparin, even among women with thrombophilia and/or previous preeclampsia (based on current evidence) (II-2 I); selenium (I-I); garlic (I-I); zinc, (III-I) pyridoxine, (III-I) iron (with or without folate), (III-I) or multivitamins with/without micronutrients. (III-I)
Recommendations: Prognosis (Maternal and Fetal) in Preeclampsia
1. Serial surveillance of maternal well-being is recommended, both antenatally and post partum. (II 3B)
2. The frequency of maternal surveillance should be at least once per week antenatally, and at least once in the first three days post partum. (III-C)
3. Serial surveillance of fetal well-being is recommended. (II-2B)
4. Antenatal fetal surveillance should include umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry. (I-A)
5. Women who develop gestational hypertension with neither proteinuria nor adverse conditions before 34 weeks should be followed closely for maternal and perinatal complications. (II-2B)
CHAPTER 3: TREATMENT OF THE HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS OF PREGNANCY
Antenatal Treatment
Recommendations: Dietary changes
1. New dietary salt restriction is not recommended. (II-2D).
2. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation about the usefulness of the following: ongoing salt restriction among women with pre-existing hypertension, (III-I) heart-healthy diet, (III-I) and calorie restriction for obese women. (III-I)
Recommendations: Lifestyle changes
1. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation about the usefulness of: exercise, (III-I) workload reduction, (III-I) or stress reduction. (III-I)
2. For women with gestational hypertension (without preeclampsia), some bed rest in hospital (compared with unrestricted activity at home) may be useful. (I-B)
3. For women with preeclampsia who are hospitalized, strict bed rest is not recommended. (I-D)
4. For all other women with HDP, the evidence is insufficient to make a recommendation about the usefulness of bed rest, which may nevertheless, be advised based on practical considerations. (III-C)
Recommendations: Place of care
1. In-patient care should be provided for women with severe hypertension or severe preeclampsia. (II-2B)
2. A component of care through hospital day units (I-B) or home care (II-2B) can be considered for women with non-severe preeclampsia or non-severe (pre-existing or gestational) hypertension.
Recommendations: Antihypertensive therapy for severe hypertension (BP of ≥ 160 mmHg systolic or ≥ 110 mmHg diastolic)
1. BP should be lowered to <160 mmHg systolic and < 110 mmHg diastolic. (II-2B)
2. Initial antihypertensive therapy should be with labetalol, (I-A) nifedipine capsules, (I-A) nifedipine PA tablets, (I-B) or hydralazine. (I-A)
3. MgSO4 is not recommended as an antihypertensive agent. (II-2 D)
4. Continuous FHR monitoring is advised until BP is stable. (III-I)
5. A variety of antihypertensive drugs may be used in the first trimester of pregnancy (e.g., methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine). (II-2B)
Recommendations: Timing of delivery of women with preeclampsia
1. Obstetric consultation is mandatory in women with severe preeclampsia. (III-B)
2. For women at < 34 weeks’ gestation, expectant management of preeclampsia (severe or non-severe) may be considered, but only in perinatal centres capable of caring for very preterm infants. (I-C)
3. For women at 34–36 weeks’ gestation with non-severe preeclampsia, there is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation about the benefits or risks of expectant management. (III-I)
4. For women at ≥ 37 weeks’ gestation with preeclampsia (severe or non-severe), immediate delivery should be considered. (III B)
Recommendations: Magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) for eclampsia prophylaxis or treatment
1. MgSO4 is recommended for first-line treatment of eclampsia. (I-A)
2. MgSO4 is recommended as prophylaxis against eclampsia in women with severe preeclampsia. (I-A)
3.MgSO4 may be considered for women with non-severe preeclampsia. (I-C)
4. Phenytoin and benzodiazepines should not be used for eclampsia prophylaxis or treatment, unless there is a contraindication to MgSO4 or it is ineffective. (I-E)
Recommendations: Plasma volume expansion for preeclampsia
1. Plasma volume expansion is not recommended for women with preeclampsia. (I-E)
Recommendations: Therapies for HELLP syndrome
1. Prophylactic transfusion of platelets is not recommended, even prior to Caesarean section, when platelet count is > 50 x 109 /L and there is no excessive bleeding or platelet dysfunction. (II-2D)
2. Consideration should be given to ordering blood products, including platelets, when platelet count is < 50 x 109 /L, platelet count is falling rapidly, and/or there is coagulopathy. (III-I)
3. Platelet transfusion should be strongly considered prior to vaginal delivery when platelet count is < 20 x 109 /L. (III-B)
4. Platelet transfusion is recommended prior to Caesarean section, when platelet count is < 20 x 109/L. (III-B)
5. Corticosteriods may be considered for women with a platelet count < 50 x109 /L. (III I)
6. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation regarding the usefulness of plasma exchange or plasmapheresis. (III-I)
Recommendations: Other therapies for treatment of preeclampsia
1. Women with preeclampsia before 34 weeks’ gestation should receive antenatal corticosteroids for acceleration of fetal pulmonary maturity. (I-A)
2. Thromboprophylaxis may be considered when bed rest is prescribed. (II-2C)
3. Low-dose aspirin is not recommended for treatment of preeclampsia. (I-E)
4. There is insufficient evidence to make recommendations about the usefulness of treatment with the following: activated protein C, (III-I) antithrombin, (I-I) heparin, (III-I) L arginine, (I-I) long-term epidural anaesthesia, (I-I) N-acetylcysteine, (I-I) probenecid, (I-I) or sildenafil nitrate. (III-I)
Postpartum Treatment Recommendations: Care in the six weeks post partum
1. BP should be measured during the time of peak postpartum BP, at days three to six after delivery. (III-B)
2. Antihypertensive therapy may be restarted post partum, particularly in women with severe preeclampsia and those who have delivered preterm. (II-2 I)
3. Severe postpartum hypertension should be treated with antihypertensive therapy, to keep systolic BP < 160 mmHg and diastolic BP < 110 mmHg. (II-2B)
4. Antihypertensive therapy may be used to treat non-severe postpartum hypertension, particularly in women with comorbidities. (III-I)
5. Antihypertensive agents acceptable for use in breastfeeding include the following: nifedipine XL, labetalol, methyldopa, captopril, and enalapril. (III-B)
6. There should be confirmation that end organ dysfunction of preeclampsia has resolved. (III-I)
7. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) should not be given post partum if hypertension is difficult to control or if there is oliguria, an elevated creatinine (i.e., ≥ 100 µM), or platelets < 50 x 109 /L. (III-I)
8. Postpartum thromboprophylaxis may be considered in women with preeclampsia, particularly following antenatal bed rest for more than four days or after Caesarean section. (III-I)
9. LMWH should not be administered post partum until at least two hours after epidural catheter removal. (III-B)
Recommendations: Care beyond six weeks post partum
1. Women with a history of severe preeclampsia (particularly those who presented or delivered before 34 weeks’ gestation) should be screened for pre-existing hypertension, (II-2B) underlying renal disease, (II-2B) and thrombophilia. (II-2C)
2. Women should be informed that intervals between pregnancies of < 2 or ≥10 years are both associated with recurrent preeclampsia. (II-2D)
3. Women who are overweight should be encouraged to attain a healthy body mass index to decrease risk in future pregnancy (II-2A) and for long-term health. (I-A)
4. Women with pre-existing hypertension should undergo the following investigations (if not done previously): urinalysis; serum sodium, potassium and creatinine; fasting glucose; fasting total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides; and standard 12-lead electrocardiography. (III-I)
5. Women who are normotensive but who have had an HDP, may benefit from assessment of traditional cardiovascular risk markers. (II-2B)
6. All women who have had an HDP should pursue a healthy diet and lifestyle. (I-B)

Thursday, February 16, 2012

jadwal R3 TAH


Ini jadwal dari saya, Mbak herlina, Mbak Fifi, Pak Fahmi, Pak Rahmat, Pak Ridho etc...
Semoga tidak ada perubahan.
Jika mau bertukar, silahkan cari ganti sendiri, dan jangan merusak jadwal yang sudah ada.